The commission holds
- Final authority on every examination
- Approval of question release
- Ownership of all examination data
- Access to complete audit trails
- Retention, disclosure, and legal-response decisions
A conducting body cannot outsource its constitutional responsibility — so the platform is built to never take it. Clear boundaries, commission-held oversight, and records that outlive any vendor relationship.
Roles must be explicit in contracts, runbooks, system permissions, escalation matrices, and post-run evidence.
The Commission retains full authority over every examination decision: what is asked, when papers release, who is verified, and how results are declared. The platform executes; it never decides.
Question banks, candidate records, results, and audit logs are the commission's property. Data residency, retention, and destruction follow the commission's policy — and exit takes your data with you.
The audit trail is held for the commission, not by grace of the vendor. Every custody event, release approval, and access attempt is inspectable by your officers at any time, without notice to us.
When an exam is challenged — in court, before a tribunal, or under RTI — the commission can produce records, not assurances: who accessed what, when releases were approved, and how answers became results.
The platform is designed to support obligations under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 — demonstrable custody, role separation, and access records — and to handle candidate personal data in line with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, under the commission's instructions as the data fiduciary.
A confidential demonstration and a structured pilot let your officers see role separation, release approvals, and the audit trail operating — not described.